Metaphysical Necessity and Contingency
Let's introduce a term that is probably unfamiliar to most: Metaphysical Necessity.
As for a definition, I will give you a few examples of things that are 'metaphysically necessary.'
- Larry is a person or Larry is not a person
- 3 + 3 = 6
- Green is a color
- All bachelors are unmarried
To illustrate this further, we will introduce two more terms: 'metaphysically impossible' and 'metaphysically contingent.'
Here are some examples of things that are metaphysically impossible:
- Larry is a person and Larry is not a person
- 3 + 3 = 46
- Green is not a color
- Not all bachelors are unmarried
And now for some examples of things that are metaphysically contingent:
- Larry is a person
- There are three sheep in the pen
- Green is the color of leaves
- Los Alamos is full of nerds
To summarize (and keep in minds that these definitions are somewhat lacking):
Metaphysically necessary: Something that must be true- it is impossible for it to be false. All bachelors are unmarried.
Metaphysically impossible: The opposite. It must be false. It is impossible for green to not be a color.
Metaphysically contingent: Can be true or false depending on the way the world is.
--------------------
Time for another definition! This one should be easy.
Metaphysically possible: things that are either metaphysically necessary or metaphysically contingent.
I do not understand metaphysics well (or metaphysicsl necessity), but I believe I have a grasp on logical necessity.
ReplyDeleteYour explanations and most of your examples here (I'm not sure about the identity statements) appear to correlate with logical necessity, rather than metaphysical necessity. Can you clarify the difference or explain how these are examples of metaphysical necessity rather than logical necessity?